Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma/Wingfield v. Page

Wingfield v. Page

1966 OK CR 166, 422 P.2d 229, 1966 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 281
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided December 21, 1966·No. No. A-14135·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

This matter comes on application of Billy Jack Wingfield for a writ of habeas corpus discharging him from custody in the State Penitentiary, where he is currently confined under authority of a judgment and sentence rendered against him in the District Court of Tulsa County, case No. 18978. The Court having examined the petition and time computation and the Response filed on behalf of the State, and being of the opinion that petitioner is not entitled to credit for time served in federal custody, finds that the allegations of petitioner are wholly insufficient to support his assertion that he has completed service of the sentence imposed in the District Court of Tulsa County, case No. 18978.

It is therefore the order of the Court that the relief prayed for should be, and the same is hereby, denied, and the application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wingfield v. Page, 1966 OK CR 166, 422 P.2d 229, 1966 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 281 (Okla. Ct. App. 1966).

1966 OK CR 166 (Wingfield v. Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
421 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State v. Prevost
574 P.2d 1319 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1977)