Wingfield v. District of Columbia
This text of Wingfield v. District of Columbia (Wingfield v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) KEVIN DARNELL WINGFIELD, ) a minor, by his mother and next friend, ) Priscilla Elizabeth Greene ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 00-cv-121 (RCL) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) Defendant. )
[ffiOPOSRt'Jl()RDER
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion issued this date in Keith Allen, et
al. v. District of Columbia, No. 00-cv-591, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant shall pay Plaintiffs, within 30 days of the date of this Order,
$2,211.61, an amount which represents the remaining interest owed to Plaintiffs on the capped
attorney's fees and costs in this case.
SO ORDERED.
Date: ROYC. LAMBERTH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wingfield v. District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wingfield-v-district-of-columbia-dcd-2021.