Wingert v. Connell ex rel. M'Call
4 Serg. & Rawle 237
This text of 4 Serg. & Rawle 237 (Wingert v. Connell ex rel. M'Call) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wingert v. Connell ex rel. M'Call, 4 Serg. & Rawle 237 (Pa. 1818).
Opinion
The judgment was professedly taken under the act of assembly, yet it was contrary to the act of [238]*238assembly, because it was entered previous to the time allow-1 ed by the act for the defendant to appear. At the time of entering the judgment, there was no default in the defendant. We are of opinion, that the .judgment should be reversed.
Judgment reversed*
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Springer v. Commonwealth
3 Pen. & W. 28 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1831)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Serg. & Rawle 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wingert-v-connell-ex-rel-mcall-pa-1818.