Wingate v. Kron

253 A.D.2d 884, 678 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9900

This text of 253 A.D.2d 884 (Wingate v. Kron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wingate v. Kron, 253 A.D.2d 884, 678 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with the matter entitled People v Wingate pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Indictment No. 11087/97.

Application by the petitioner for poor person relief and the assignment of counsel.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding and the application, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the branch of the application which is for poor person relief is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Pizzuto, J. P., Joy, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rush v. Mordue
502 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Holtzman v. Goldman
523 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D.2d 884, 678 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wingate-v-kron-nyappdiv-1998.