Wingate v. Celebrity Cruises

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wingate v. Celebrity Cruises

47 So. 3d 934, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17160, 2010 WL 4483489

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 10, 2010·No. 3D09-1241·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, Jerrold Wingate and The Wingate Law Firm, appeal from an Order of Contempt, finding them in contempt for willfully disobeying the lower tribunal’s prior court order and knowingly receiving money in violation of that order. Following our review of the order, we agree with the appellants that the Order of Contempt contains a mathematical error, and therefore, remand with directions to enter an amended order, reflecting that appellants must repay $219,653.07, not $333,727.74. In all other respects, we affirm, finding that the appellants’ remaining argument lacks merit.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, Jerrold Wingate and The Wingate Law Firm, appeal from an Order of Contempt, finding them in contempt for willfully disobeying the lower tribunal’s prior court order and knowingly receiving money in violation of that order. Following our review of the order, we agree with the appellants that the Order of Contempt contains a mathematical error, and therefore, remand with directions to enter an amended order, reflecting that appellants must repay $219,653.07, not $333,727.74. In all other respects, we affirm, finding that the appellants’ remaining argument lacks merit.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

Wingate v. Celebrity Cruises, 47 So. 3d 934, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17160, 2010 WL 4483489 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

47 So. 3d 934 (Wingate v. Celebrity Cruises) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related