Wingate v. Brooks

3 Cal. 112
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Cal. 112 (Wingate v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wingate v. Brooks, 3 Cal. 112 (Cal. 1853).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court, Wells, Justice, concurring.

This was an action on a statute bond, given to the sheriff, and by him assigned to the plaintiff.

At the time, the defendant moved for a nonsuit, which was refused, and the refusal is here assigned for error.

I think the nonsuit was properly refused. ' The first ground [113]*113for the motion is not well taken. The bond seems to me substantially to conform to the requisitions of the act, and no variation has been pointed out.

The succeeding grounds are based upon the action of the court in the case in which the bond was given. The errors of that case, if any, cannot be reviewed in this.

The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Insurance Co. of North America v. Taylor
1912 OK 463 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cal. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wingate-v-brooks-cal-1853.