Wingard v. Wingard

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Wingard v. Wingard

625 So. 2d 441, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 203, 1993 WL 133251

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedApril 30, 1993

DocketAV92000019

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 625 So. 2d 441 (Wingard v. Wingard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wingard v. Wingard, 625 So. 2d 441, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 203, 1993 WL 133251 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

YATES, Judge.

This is an attempted appeal in a post-divorce case.

In the parties’ divorce judgment, custody of their two minor children originally was granted to Beverly June Wingard (mother), but it subsequently was changed and granted to Michael Lamar Wingard (father). In March 1992, the father filed a motion to modify, seeking child support from the mother. The mother answered and counter-petitioned, claiming that the father failed to pay child support and certain insurance premiums for the minor children when they were in her custody. The trial court subsequently entered an order finding no arrearage against the father in child support he previously had been ordered to pay, and requiring the mother to commence paying child support to the father.

The mother appeals and, among other things, argues that the trial court erred in failing to order the father to reimburse her for insurance premiums which he previously had been ordered to pay, but which she paid [442]*442instead. We note, however, that the trial court did not address this issue, although the mother raised such issue in her counter-petition. Also, we note that the trial court did not enter a Rule 54(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment.

It is well-settled law in Alabama that an order must be a final judgment before it can support an appeal. Ala.Code 1975, § 12-22-2; Hardy v. State ex rel. Chambers, 541 So.2d 566 (Ala.Civ.App.1989). “A ‘final judgment’ is a terminal decision which demonstrates there has been complete adjudication of all matters in controversy between the litigants.” Tidwell v. Tidwell, 496 So.2d 91, 92 (Ala.Civ.App.1986).

Because of the lack of a final judgment or a judgment entered pursuant to Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P., we dismiss this appeal as premature. In so doing, we note that, once the trial court enters a final judgment, counsel may appeal if not satisfied, and then may request that this court incorporate the present record on such subsequent appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

YATES, Judge.

This is an attempted appeal in a post-divorce case.

In the parties’ divorce judgment, custody of their two minor children originally was granted to Beverly June Wingard (mother), but it subsequently was changed and granted to Michael Lamar Wingard (father). In March 1992, the father filed a motion to modify, seeking child support from the mother. The mother answered and counter-petitioned, claiming that the father failed to pay child support and certain insurance premiums for the minor children when they were in her custody. The trial court subsequently entered an order finding no arrearage against the father in child support he previously had been ordered to pay, and requiring the mother to commence paying child support to the father.

The mother appeals and, among other things, argues that the trial court erred in failing to order the father to reimburse her for insurance premiums which he previously had been ordered to pay, but which she paid [442]*442instead. We note, however, that the trial court did not address this issue, although the mother raised such issue in her counter-petition. Also, we note that the trial court did not enter a Rule 54(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment.

It is well-settled law in Alabama that an order must be a final judgment before it can support an appeal. Ala.Code 1975, § 12-22-2; Hardy v. State ex rel. Chambers, 541 So.2d 566 (Ala.Civ.App.1989). “A ‘final judgment’ is a terminal decision which demonstrates there has been complete adjudication of all matters in controversy between the litigants.” Tidwell v. Tidwell, 496 So.2d 91, 92 (Ala.Civ.App.1986).

Because of the lack of a final judgment or a judgment entered pursuant to Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P., we dismiss this appeal as premature. In so doing, we note that, once the trial court enters a final judgment, counsel may appeal if not satisfied, and then may request that this court incorporate the present record on such subsequent appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

625 So. 2d 441, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 203, 1993 WL 133251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wingard-v-wingard-alacivapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack