Wing v. State

120 S.E. 437, 31 Ga. App. 155, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 796
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 14, 1923
Docket14827
StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 437 (Wing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wing v. State, 120 S.E. 437, 31 Ga. App. 155, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 796 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the particular facts of the case this court cannot hold as a matter of law that the trial court abused its discretion in setting aside a former judgment of the court ordering a nolle prosequi to an indictment against the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Lankford & Rogers, I. H. Corbitt, for plaintiff in error, cited:

Civil Code (1910), §§ 3987-8, 5370, 4032; 128 Ga. 358; 19 Ga. App. 368 (3), 158.

Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, Enoch J. Giles, contra, cited:

16 Corpus Juris, 437-8; 39 Ga. 394, and cit.; Civil Code (1910), §§ 4584, 4629, 5965.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dobbins v. Dupree
39 Ga. 394 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1869)
Lanier v. Nunnally & Co.
57 S.E. 689 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Philip Carey Co. v. Sheppard
91 S.E. 444 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 S.E. 437, 31 Ga. App. 155, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wing-v-state-gactapp-1923.