Wing v. State

120 S.E. 437, 31 Ga. App. 155, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 796

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the particular facts of the case this court cannot hold as a matter of law that the trial court abused its discretion in setting aside a former judgment of the court ordering a nolle prosequi to an indictment against the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Lankford & Rogers, I. H. Corbitt, for plaintiff in error, cited:

Civil Code (1910), §§ 3987-8, 5370, 4032; 128 Ga. 358; 19 Ga. App. 368 (3), 158.

Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, Enoch J. Giles, contra, cited:

16 Corpus Juris, 437-8; 39 Ga. 394, and cit.; Civil Code (1910), §§ 4584, 4629, 5965.