Wing v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wing v. State

564 So. 2d 634, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5687, 1990 WL 108844

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 2, 1990

DocketNo. 90-611

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 564 So. 2d 634 (Wing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wing v. State, 564 So. 2d 634, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5687, 1990 WL 108844 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

Frederick Wing appeals the summary denial of his post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He alleges that his plea of nolo contendere was not knowingly or voluntarily entered. We remand to the trial court for either attachment of that portion of the record which refutes his allegations, or for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HARRIS, J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., concurs in conclusion only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOSHORN, Judge.

Frederick Wing appeals the summary denial of his post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He alleges that his plea of nolo contendere was not knowingly or voluntarily entered. We remand to the trial court for either attachment of that portion of the record which refutes his allegations, or for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HARRIS, J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., concurs in conclusion only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 634, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5687, 1990 WL 108844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wing-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack