Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wing v. SAKS, INC.

Wing v. SAKS, INC.

943 So. 2d 1026, 2006 WL 3734422
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 2006
Docket3D06-1035, 3D06-562
StatusPublished

This text of 943 So. 2d 1026 (Wing v. SAKS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wing v. SAKS, INC., 943 So. 2d 1026, 2006 WL 3734422 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

943 So.2d 1026 (2006)

Eunide WING, Appellant,
v.
SAKS, INC., d/b/a Saks Fifth Avenue, and American Express Travel Related Services Co. Inc., Appellees.

Nos. 3D06-1035, 3D06-562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 20, 2006.

Abbie Cuellar, Hialeah, for appellant.

Kahan Shir and Paul E. Heimberg, Boca Raton; Adams, Adams & Baca and Joel V. Lumer, Miami; Fowler White Burnett and Ronald G. Neiwirth, Miami, for appellees.

Before FLETCHER and CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Brown v. Hanger, 368 So.2d 63, 65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Long, 318 F.Supp. 156 (W.D.Pa.1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Transamerica Insurance Company v. Long
318 F. Supp. 156 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Brown v. Hanger
368 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
943 So. 2d 1026, 2006 WL 3734422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wing-v-saks-inc-fladistctapp-2006.