Wing v. Owen

9 Cal. 247
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 9 Cal. 247 (Wing v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wing v. Owen, 9 Cal. 247 (Cal. 1858).

Opinion

Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.

In this case no statement was filed setting forth the grounds upon which the defendants intended to rely on their motion for a new trial. The failure to file such statement operates as a waiver of the right to the motion. (Practice Act, sec. 195; Adams v. The City of Oakland, 8 Cal., 510.)

The order granting a new trial is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kerns v. Dean
6 P. 704 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Caldwell v. Greely
5 Nev. 258 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1869)
Corcoran v. Doll
32 Cal. 82 (California Supreme Court, 1867)
Hutton v. Reed
25 Cal. 478 (California Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Cal. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wing-v-owen-cal-1858.