Wing v. Owen
9 Cal. 247
This text of 9 Cal. 247 (Wing v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wing v. Owen, 9 Cal. 247 (Cal. 1858).
Opinion
In this case no statement was filed setting forth the grounds upon which the defendants intended to rely on their motion for a new trial. The failure to file such statement operates as a waiver of the right to the motion. (Practice Act, sec. 195; Adams v. The City of Oakland, 8 Cal., 510.)
The order granting a new trial is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kerns v. Dean
6 P. 704 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Caldwell v. Greely
5 Nev. 258 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1869)
Corcoran v. Doll
32 Cal. 82 (California Supreme Court, 1867)
Hutton v. Reed
25 Cal. 478 (California Supreme Court, 1864)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 Cal. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wing-v-owen-cal-1858.