Wing-Miliken v. State
111 So. 3d 189, 2013 WL 332696, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s modification of the defendant’s sentence following a violation of furlough proceeding, during which the defendant was not afforded an opportunity to explain his failure to appear. On remand, the trial court must allow the defendant an opportunity to explain why he failed to appear. See Fulton v. State, 66 So.3d 950, 951 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wing-Miliken v. State, 111 So. 3d 189, 2013 WL 332696, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
111 So. 3d 189 (Wing-Miliken v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fulton v. State
66 So. 3d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)