Wing ex rel. Wing v. Godwin

156 S.E.2d 683, 271 N.C. 426, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1211
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 20, 1967·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We take notice of the fact that G.S. 20-13 (effective May 5, 1967) was amended by Chapter 295, Session Laws of 1967 (now G.S. 20-13.1). However, at the time the petitioner was tried in the City Police Court of Hendersonville and his provisional operator’s license was revoked, the revocation was mandatory and not subject to court review. Fox v. Scheidt, 241 N.C. 31, 84 S.E. 2d 58. The court should have dismissed the petition. Judge Riddle was without authority to award a new trial in the Police Court of Hen-dersonville. If the judgment was erroneous, the error could only be corrected by a direct appeal to the Superior Court. The motion to dismiss should have been allowed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wing ex rel. Wing v. Godwin, 156 S.E.2d 683, 271 N.C. 426, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1211 (N.C. 1967).

156 S.E.2d 683 (Wing ex rel. Wing v. Godwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harper v. Atlanta Milling Company
48 S.E.2d 89 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)