Winfrey v. Johnson
This text of Winfrey v. Johnson (Winfrey v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 20-20477 Document: 00516206082 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2022
REVISED 2/17/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED November 12, 2021 No. 20-20477 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Richard Winfrey, Jr.,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
San Jacinto County,
Defendant,
Megan Winfrey,
Lenard Johnson, Former San Jacinto County Sheriff’s Department Deputy,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC Nos. 4:10-CV-1896, 4:14-CV-448 Case: 20-20477 Document: 00516206082 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2022
No. 20-20477
Before Clement, Southwick, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* This is the fourth appeal in this § 1983 case. 1 Having heard oral argument and reviewed the briefing, record, and applicable law, we find no reversible error and AFFIRM, thus upholding the jury verdict in favor of Plaintiffs.
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 1 See Winfrey v. San Jacinto Cnty. (Winfrey I), 481 F. App’x 969 (5th Cir. 2012); Winfrey v. Rogers (Winfrey II), 901 F.3d 483 (5th Cir. 2018); Winfrey v. Johnson (Winfrey III), 766 F. App’x 66 (5th Cir. 2019).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Winfrey v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winfrey-v-johnson-ca5-2022.