Winfree v. Winfree
206 P. 1061, 104 Or. 235, 1922 Ore. LEXIS 16
This text of 206 P. 1061 (Winfree v. Winfree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Winfree v. Winfree, 206 P. 1061, 104 Or. 235, 1922 Ore. LEXIS 16 (Or. 1922).
Opinion
We cannot reverse this case upon a transcript that does not bring up all of the testimony. It is fair to presume that the able and careful jurist who heard this case found something in the oral testimony that neutralized the effect of the charges made in the affidavits filed.
The, decree is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
206 P. 1061, 104 Or. 235, 1922 Ore. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winfree-v-winfree-or-1922.