Winfred Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 1, 2017·No. A17A2088·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 01, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A2088. WINFRED JOHNSON v. THE STATE.

A jury found Winfred Johnson guilty of first-degree burglary. Johnson’s attorney filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. Johnson has filed a pro se notice of appeal of that denial. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

A criminal defendant does not have the right to represent himself while also being represented by an attorney. See Tolbert v. Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 361-363 (3) (767 SE2d 24) (2014); Jacobsen v. Haldi, 210 Ga. App. 817, 818-819 (1) (437 SE2d 819) (1993). Nothing in the record indicates that Johnson’s attorney has been permitted to withdraw. Accordingly, his pro se notice of appeal is a nullity, see id., and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/01/2017

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winfred Johnson v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Winfred Johnson v. State (Winfred Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacobsen v. Haldi
437 S.E.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Tolbert v. Toole
767 S.E.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)