Winfield v. Totten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Winfield v. Totten

249 A.D. 672, 291 N.Y.S. 307, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5467

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 11, 1936·Published

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment and order dismissing her complaint in a partition action. A deed purporting to have been signed and acknowledged by her has been on record for more than forty years. During these years she has made no claim that she owned an interest in the land. Her conduct since the acknowledgment of the deed (1894) is compatible with an inference that she did sign and acknowledge it. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment and order dismissing her complaint in a partition action. A deed purporting to have been signed and acknowledged by her has been on record for more than forty years. During these years she has made no claim that she owned an interest in the land. Her conduct since the acknowledgment of the deed (1894) is compatible with an inference that she did sign and acknowledge it. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Winfield v. Totten, 249 A.D. 672, 291 N.Y.S. 307, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

249 A.D. 672 (Winfield v. Totten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.