Winfield v. Totten
This text of 249 A.D. 672 (Winfield v. Totten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment and order dismissing her complaint in a partition action. A deed purporting to have been signed and acknowledged by her has been on record for more than forty years. During these years she has made no claim that she owned an interest in the land. Her conduct since the acknowledgment of the deed (1894) is compatible with an inference that she did sign and acknowledge it. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 672, 291 N.Y.S. 307, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winfield-v-totten-nyappdiv-1936.