Winfield v. Totten

249 A.D. 672, 291 N.Y.S. 307, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5467

This text of 249 A.D. 672 (Winfield v. Totten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winfield v. Totten, 249 A.D. 672, 291 N.Y.S. 307, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment and order dismissing her complaint in a partition action. A deed purporting to have been signed and acknowledged by her has been on record for more than forty years. During these years she has made no claim that she owned an interest in the land. Her conduct since the acknowledgment of the deed (1894) is compatible with an inference that she did sign and acknowledge it. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 672, 291 N.Y.S. 307, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winfield-v-totten-nyappdiv-1936.