Winfield v. Brompton Air Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Winfield v. Brompton Air Services

443 So. 2d 466, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11276

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 11, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1676

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 443 So. 2d 466 (Winfield v. Brompton Air Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winfield v. Brompton Air Services, 443 So. 2d 466, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11276 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

HERSEY, Judge.

In aid of execution of a final judgment, various attempts were made to take the deposition of appellant, a party in the litigation out of which the judgment arose. Appellant appeared by counsel to protest discovery. Many attempts to take the deposition were to no avail. The latest attempt was subjected to a motion to strike which was denied. That denial is the subject of this appeal. We affirm.

A judgment debtor is subject to discovery procedures. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.560. If represented by an attorney, service is obtained by delivering a copy of the notice of taking deposition to the party’s attorney. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.080(b). Appellant flirts with contempt. No further impediments to discovery should be permitted.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI