Winfield Frank Leach v. Virginia H. Wolfe and Earl Wolfe

397 F.2d 814
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 1968
Docket25264
StatusPublished

This text of 397 F.2d 814 (Winfield Frank Leach v. Virginia H. Wolfe and Earl Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winfield Frank Leach v. Virginia H. Wolfe and Earl Wolfe, 397 F.2d 814 (5th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Construing the charge of the trial court as a whole, we conclude that the inclusion by the trial court of the sentence selected for attack by appellant did not amount to prejudicial error.

The Judgment is affirmed.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above styled and numbered cause be, and the same is, hereby denied. •*-

Judge CLAYTON was unable to participate in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 F.2d 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winfield-frank-leach-v-virginia-h-wolfe-and-earl-wolfe-ca5-1968.