Winfield Frank Leach v. Virginia H. Wolfe and Earl Wolfe
This text of 397 F.2d 814 (Winfield Frank Leach v. Virginia H. Wolfe and Earl Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Construing the charge of the trial court as a whole, we conclude that the inclusion by the trial court of the sentence selected for attack by appellant did not amount to prejudicial error.
The Judgment is affirmed.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above styled and numbered cause be, and the same is, hereby denied. •*-
Judge CLAYTON was unable to participate in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 F.2d 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winfield-frank-leach-v-virginia-h-wolfe-and-earl-wolfe-ca5-1968.