Winery v. WD Energy Services, Inc.
This text of 270 F. App'x 629 (Winery v. WD Energy Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP appeals a district court order requiring it to pay a $10,000 sanction to the court and $92,078.97 in costs to E & J Gallo Winery after a finding of bad faith and vexatious conduct relating to its extrajudicial interference with a third-party deposition. The sanctions payable to the district court are not immediately appealable. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because there is no final order. Stanley v. Woodford, 449 F.3d 1060, 1065 (9th Cir.2006).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 F. App'x 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winery-v-wd-energy-services-inc-ca9-2008.