Winer v. Winer

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Winer v. Winer

254 N.E.2d 257, 356 Mass. 733, 1969 Mass. LEXIS 918

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 23, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The husband appeals solely from that part of the separate support decree which awarded the wife certain specific sums and thereafter weekly support payments. The probate judge filed a report of material facts and the evidence is reported. We do not think it necessary to detail or summarize the facts or to discuss the specific contentions of the husband. The legal principles govern[734]*734ing this case do not require repetition. Coe v. Coe, 313 Mass. 232, 235. Jasper v. Jasper, 333 Mass. 223. We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that the findings of the judge are supported by the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the award.

Jacob Y. Young for the respondent. Paul R. Sugarman for the petitioner.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The husband appeals solely from that part of the separate support decree which awarded the wife certain specific sums and thereafter weekly support payments. The probate judge filed a report of material facts and the evidence is reported. We do not think it necessary to detail or summarize the facts or to discuss the specific contentions of the husband. The legal principles govern[734]*734ing this case do not require repetition. Coe v. Coe, 313 Mass. 232, 235. Jasper v. Jasper, 333 Mass. 223. We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that the findings of the judge are supported by the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the award.

Jacob Y. Young for the respondent. Paul R. Sugarman for the petitioner.

Decree affirmed.

Winer v. Winer, 254 N.E.2d 257, 356 Mass. 733, 1969 Mass. LEXIS 918 (Mass. 1969).

Pincite

254 N.E.2d 257 (Winer v. Winer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related