Winer v. Winer
This text of 254 N.E.2d 257 (Winer v. Winer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The husband appeals solely from that part of the separate support decree which awarded the wife certain specific sums and thereafter weekly support payments. The probate judge filed a report of material facts and the evidence is reported. We do not think it necessary to detail or summarize the facts or to discuss the specific contentions of the husband. The legal principles govern[734]*734ing this case do not require repetition. Coe v. Coe, 313 Mass. 232, 235. Jasper v. Jasper, 333 Mass. 223. We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that the findings of the judge are supported by the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the award.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 N.E.2d 257, 356 Mass. 733, 1969 Mass. LEXIS 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winer-v-winer-mass-1969.