Winer v. Boston & Maine Railroad
This text of 143 N.E.2d 215 (Winer v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. This is an action of tort for negligence. The plaintiff while a passenger on a train of the defendant slipped on the first step down from the platform of the car from which she was alighting in Boston and was injured. The only evidence as to the step was that it was “worn, shiny and smooth in the center and worn down and shiny on the outer edge and on each side of the center . . . there were little bumps” or “raised elevations” which were part of the step and did not appear in the worn part. A verdict for the defendant was directed and the plaintiff excepted. The epithets, worn, shiny and smooth, standing alone or with the vague reference to “little bumps,” are insufficient to describe a condition which could be found to be defective and a source of danger to passengers. Grace v. Boston Elevated Railway, 322 Mass. 224. Dolan v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 328 Mass. 532, 534-535.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 N.E.2d 215, 336 Mass. 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winer-v-boston-maine-railroad-mass-1957.