Wineman v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 686 (Wineman v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To set aside a judgment of non-suit, in a case wherein relator was plaintiff, and one Van Baalan arid another, were defendants.
Denied January 19, 1877.
A previous non-suit had been set aside upon payment of an attorney fee. The attorney fee was not paid, but defendants noticed the case for trial. At the opening of the term, plaintiff’s counsel announced that the case was improperly on the docket, for the reason that plaintiff had not complied with the order setting aside the non-suit, but the court set the case down for trial on a day specified. On that day plaintiff failed to appear, and the second non-suit was entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 686, 35 McGrath 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wineman-v-circuit-judge-mich-1877.