Winegard Co. v. Electronic Controlled Systems, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Winegard Co. v. Electronic Controlled Systems, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 2012

Docket2012-1282

StatusUnpublished

This text of Winegard Co. v. Electronic Controlled Systems, Inc. (Winegard Co. v. Electronic Controlled Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winegard Co. v. Electronic Controlled Systems, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

WINEGARD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as King Controls), Defendant-Appellant. ____________________

2012-1282 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa in case no. 09-CV-0138, Senior Judge Charles R. Wolle. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ROBERT V.P. WATERMAN, JR., Lane & Waterman LLP, of Davenport, Iowa, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was APRIL A. MARSHALL.

RANDALL T. SKAAR, Skaar Ulbrich Macari, P.A., of Minnetonka, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was SCOTT G. ULBRICH. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, PLAGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 16, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI