Winecoff v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance

170 S.E. 215, 47 Ga. App. 197, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 343
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 13, 1933·No. 22834·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

This was a suit upon two promissory notes executed by Central Realty Company and made payable to the plaintiff, and indorsed by W. F. Winecoff. Defendant Winecoff filed a plea and answer, which the court struck on demurrer, and a verdict was subsequently directed against both defendants and in favor of the plaintiff for the amount sued for, with interest, attorney’s fees, costs of court, and a special lien against real estate described in the plaintiff’s petition. The plea and answer, properly construed (most strongly against the pleader), was so uncertain and evasive that it amounted in law to an admission of all the allegations in the plaintiff’s petition, and it was properly stricken on demurrer. The answer having been stricken, the direction of the verdict in favor of the plaintiff was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winecoff v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance, 170 S.E. 215, 47 Ga. App. 197, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 343 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

170 S.E. 215 (Winecoff v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guaranty Life Insurance v. Graham
199 S.E. 829 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Gulf Life Insurance v. Davis
183 S.E. 640 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)