Winebrinner v. Hanna

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Winebrinner v. Hanna

9 Ky. 357

DecidedJune 12, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Ky. 357 (Winebrinner v. Hanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winebrinner v. Hanna, 9 Ky. 357 (Ky. Ct. App. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion of the court.

According to the case of Sanders against Beall’s adm’r, [358]*3584 Bibb, 342, the circuit court decided correctly in sustaining Hanna’s demurrer to Winebrinner’s plea, alledging a failure to perform a covenant contained in a different instrument to that upon which this action was brought, although the covenant set up in the plea formed the consideration of the note upon which Hanna’s action is founded.

Talbot for appellant, Bibb for appellee.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed with cost and damages—

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion of the court.

According to the case of Sanders against Beall’s adm’r, [358]*3584 Bibb, 342, the circuit court decided correctly in sustaining Hanna’s demurrer to Winebrinner’s plea, alledging a failure to perform a covenant contained in a different instrument to that upon which this action was brought, although the covenant set up in the plea formed the consideration of the note upon which Hanna’s action is founded.

Talbot for appellant, Bibb for appellee.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed with cost and damages—

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Ky. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winebrinner-v-hanna-kyctapp-1820.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack