Windy Cove, Inc. v. Circle K Stores, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 WINDY COVE, INC. et al., Case No. 21-cv-1416-MMA-DEB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 v. FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

14 CIRCLE K STORES, INC., [Doc. No. 191] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees. See Doc. 21 No. 193. Defendant simultaneously filed a motion for leave to file an unredacted version 22 of its motion and exhibits under seal. See Doc. No. 191. Defendant’s motion is 23 unopposed to date. 24 When presented with a request to file a document under seal, the Court begins with 25 the strong presumption in favor of the “general right to inspect and copy public records 26 and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, 27 Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 n.7 (1978); see also Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 28 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). “Accordingly, ‘a party seeking to seal a judicial | ||record then bears the burden of overcoming this strong presumption by meeting the 2 compelling reasons standard.’” Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 3 || 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). However, where the 4 || motion is not “more than tangentially related to the merits,” the moving party need only 5 show “good cause” to seal. Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097. 6 Having reviewed Defendant’s motion and supporting declaration, the Court finds 7 || good cause to seal the requested documents. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS 8 || Defendant’s motion and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to file Doc. No. 192 UNDER 9 ||SEAL. 11 Dated: September 25, 2023 12 Mikel (lights 13 HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28