Windsor v. Tillottson

19 A. 817, 135 Pa. 208, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1172
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 19, 1890·No. No. 27·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We are very clear that this writ of venditioni exponas was improvidently issued. The judgment had been opened, proceedings to stay in the meantime. The issue had been tried in the court below with the result of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. A motion was made for a new trial, and pending this motion the execution was issued. The case was not determined. The pendency of a motion for a new trial left it open. Under such circumstances, it was not only irregular to issue the writ of venditioni exponas, but it came dangerously near being a contempt of court. It was probably not so intended.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Windsor v. Tillottson, 19 A. 817, 135 Pa. 208, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1172 (Pa. 1890).

19 A. 817 (Windsor v. Tillottson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMillan v. McMillan
67 S.W.2d 342 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)