Windsor v. Martinez

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedSeptember 24, 2010
DocketCivil Action No. 2011-0929
StatusPublished

This text of Windsor v. Martinez (Windsor v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Windsor v. Martinez, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

§'N TH_E UN_§_'§.`EB S"_§`A'"§`ES '§BISTR?CT C{HJ'(RT `§`*`GR T.HE M§`E}DLE _EB`§STRZC'_E` {)F P`IS`NNS Y`_E'..`§'°'AN.E`A

`§`.,»(}N§?§E_}§'B{}N '_§`. W'§NBS{)R, :

`§"e€§€i<)ner

era

o

3a . C§VIL NO. S:XG~C"»"'-fi?§éi§

`R@ E‘¢§,¢§R'§`_E`NEZ, WARHKN', : {Judgie Mun§ef§y') He.zspenrieni :

MET M {)§SE,§*;,§}TD UM B::ckg,“fruug@_g§

E_,c»_zi_eiai'on T_ V\.»’ind;~‘.<_)r ("P€’eitiorzer"), am inznate presczzt}y' c=:snf‘:_r;s:<'i :1'1 ihs .f\iiezz‘sv<')<)d Uzz_iiecé ;‘§€z~;tc:<: ii*e':zs`.?.z:ni'ia;“_v, W}'zite fi}e:<=:r._ Pcazrz::y'i'x'zu:aia i_"‘?jSP~./-‘_\._ilera‘.>»'<)<)d"), initiaieci i'ixis`;)r@ se b;zb<:;z:~; c<>:';')u:a pcvi'i'iioz) pursuz'm.t w 28 U,§§.(,`. § EZ-'fii. _E*etiti.<.zner has disc :=;ui?)xniiterj an ir~z_fé‘))”)zza j)¢zz;lr;,=s.=;'.»".z' '<).p;:»}i¢:;a.i§oz_z ‘w'izici: wi}i be g;r'<'zrztezj. (A`if)c>c. 21 Nanzézd as Re;»'po.ndc‘.nt is I_.`.='L*§ji’».»‘\lEc-:n‘,».~'o<)d `Vv’:z:_xi¢::z I\`;. ?vi;zz'€.ir:_<::.'¢:,

Vv'inr €§.` {2) counts of

pa).@_:scs::;ic>;'; <_)i" a §E_rcann during a crime of v§<')§e:aar¢: or s;iangeroz;s <,)i’§’¢:azse, and cm'zfyixzg a pi 3103

with¢,)'uz'. az ?iczzn.'~_:e." {Dc>c. 1, il _‘5.) 911 Ju':ze §_'_7.’., §99§'§, Wimds<)r x’.fas s<:)~.i<-:nced to a _€"<')rty' {40) year 10 §i£":? z'¢:rn_z c_)l"i_nepz“isc»zzrzze:ni'.‘ in asa ;>=zzccza‘zzpazaj/ing su'ppori'ixzg ineznorzir;d‘czzzz, Petitionez' states thai 2a Iinz¢;:§y' ap})¢:zzi of his ar:_zrz'~zi»‘:.ti.¢.?)'n was §'il<->d ufith the D. (ffoe,zri' c'i`d.fx_p_pszais 09 july I,O, 19§?8. (_;D¢_)z:. 3 at p. 4’). Wiwz':ds=;)r :1§.€,0 §n<.ii<:~<'zt¢;:s that a c;<)uazs=:§c~:d i?~`e§~.»;ra‘s;zry' §4. ZGO{? p<)si'~conx/'ictic>n m:.)'li<)z: ;)uzfsuan.t 10 §f).(f.". €f.`.<)ci.c § 23»1£€) was filed with the trial ¢;:¢311:“:.3‘ fm April 24, 1»`5€)€)(3, Pcf,ii'i<;)ner ;'zzzr‘p<)'rf.c:d.€y' aiis<;¢;)\;crc:§ “"'¥.§121€'<:z:z'tain,poz't§on{_sf of 1116 m'iai ;')rc)c<;f:dizags ami ex"‘i.c}c»:r_a‘ti;z:'y' ru§ingss" xv:::r<: missing i°r<_>;xz i*h_»;: “Lra.n:s:;ri;zt. {_j_§. al p. 51 'i"h¢: n'zis.<,:ing u'iai iranse:z'§pt issue was subsec;u¢_nr!j/ brought m rim zai;tes,:ii<.zz: o'i`b<)th the trial <;Qrzri' and the Coz.z_rt of Appe:als. {§c;i_.). Acc<'zrziiizizz_.>, to ‘J‘»’i;'zd's<)'r, his § 234 `Z.G zu<)'£io;: was denied without a hcarizzg by ihs iria§

cr_)u;;'i ma Ja,rz,uz),zi;~f '24, Z{H}l. €_'_f_i“i§ova§'ng submission of a sz:ppiemeni'al brief and <)ra§ a'rge;uz:azn'¥,, “z§ae: Couz“€ of ,»'-‘ap;)ezzi.<; "‘zii"f.`:z‘z'r)ed am the nzerits;"’ but :rerrza,n.s;~;i£`xzi ~att@'zr;;)i m oh'i'a,in tim mis$iz:g pc):*i.i<).r: of 1136 tz'zz.nscript/'recos~d," Peiitioner Eled a pin se ':n<)i'§<'>ra i'<_:~ rc:c;:'.»i§l the mandate on I\/Izn'<;h `§9, 2099 {1_£§.) 'I`he ,E".`»‘.CT. C¢31':1't

a decision am i._'}c:csber 2_, 2{}€.`)?`} denying eha request to recall the n:zzxldate. 'i`he_rein, the C@ur£ of

‘ E§*'e.ii€ioner news i§zat his s»:nzie'n;zc runs <:¢;)nsc~:cutiv¢:_fy 10 a smzic»,‘nce imposed li)r ar;c)'i.her cc_zzz'v'i<;tiz`)n, (:Dc»e:. 3 at ;_;). 4_`).

"‘ Wir:ai.s~:c»x"s su€z:'zzissi¢')ra indicates tlzat his initial clirecf£ app<:;al was stayed ;)¢.rzch`_ng res<)iution a')'?`his § 234 §§ n'z.:')tiz)n.

f\.)

./-‘=.,;);_)eziis _rze§'eii iii'iat °‘tize absence of tile trz"insc'i'i_;_)“z. did net prejudice bias {‘w§/iiiaisei'j in receiving a 'i_`ziir i'e‘aiew <)i"<;ieizrie

`?“~ieve:i:ii>ei' l’.¢i, '.?,i}€`)f%`?, he ?iied 21 'ri'io'lion ii`<)r reiiea'i'iz_zg wi?.ii the D‘C. Ceu'r“r €)i`z~\.p;)ez':.!s \;s'hieh is

:ii')_;:‘s.i'e;_iii_y :¢:i.iii ;;)e.nding before diaz c<)izri.'j'

iii his pending ae:ii_eri, Wir_idser iiiiii;iiiy e§aim_s e_ri_i;.iiien‘ieiif. 10 fedei_‘ai izei')eas eerp‘us rciiei

en die basis that he ‘~vzis denied dies ;:»ifoce.ss die.riz'ig iz_is direct appeai ciue fe die aizserzee ei’ai c<_):_z::_;_>ietcz iri.zzi recer<;i. {i§. §§ 12__ (;`:R{'BL?ND QNH`). His second ciz'iii’a'i eorit.en¢.is thai the a

i~i_z'z`beas e<_)';rg_)us petitions size s¢.iizject to ;~;Liinnia'x';f ci'is'xnissai pu'z'sz:.;znii 10 Rzii<: 4 (‘“§"s_'eii_r:.isi:i:i';'y' Ciizisiderziiioiz by the Jziiige""`} ef the Ruies Govern.ing Seeii<)ii 2254 Cases in the limited Si';iies i?istz‘iet §Ieui'ts, 23 U.S.{,`T. ii')ii< § 2254 (_?9'7?). Muteize v. Peiiizs‘,>i\)aiiizz Beard _i?j;gim);:".;§gg;q__;i;;,;,i___§?_;._;;~_;i__i_<.;, '.EGH'F WL 84655?? ""Z (}’*vi.}f). `E’s. Merciz i€}, ZGG?`}{K<):»:£E<, J,`f). The pi~:_ixi'isii)n;~; of i`{izie 4 are z=.p;)ii='.:ai_>ie 110 ZZZ~'i~i pei;i€.iens under Ruie i{iz`}). ;_e_§ i’aitezz \r. i»`ersi'ieri,,

49£ i’-'. Sr_:p;_>. 156, i$?.§~§@ {i‘»’i.f§. Pzii i‘.-'Vi%?`). Ruie 4 izreviciczs in pertinemi pz'zri': "ii`ii. piainiy'

3 §§ is zi<;)i¢zci that mii'tep<:»its his recitation of die prc)eeciiii~zii Zii_s‘i<_i:'j¢ <_i'i'f'iis criminai

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Windsor v. Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windsor-v-martinez-dcd-2010.