Windsor v. Compton

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 4, 2004
• Docket: 04-6452
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6452

ANDREW WINDSOR, a/k/a Darryl Thomas, a/k/a Andrew Wilson, a/k/a John Carlton Harris, a/k/a Joseph Williams,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

B. G. COMPTON; DEJESUE; DAVID ROFF, Health Services Administrator; C. M. STRICKLAND; AW; PHAM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-04-65-SGW)

Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 4, 2004

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Windsor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Andrew Windsor appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his petition for writ of habeas

corpus, which the district court properly construed as a complaint

filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)

(2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Windsor v. Compton,

No. CA-04-65-SGW (W.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -