Windsor v. Campos
This text of Windsor v. Campos (Windsor v. Campos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PRINCE’ AMELIO MASON WINDSOR, I,
Plaintiff, Civ. No. 2:24-cv-00099-CL
v. ORDER
SGT. A. CAMPOS, S. RENN, B. IRVING, and N. SOBOTTA,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#40), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#40) is adopted. Defendants’ Motion for summary judgment (#29) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of March, 2025. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Windsor v. Campos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windsor-v-campos-ord-2025.