Windsor v. Campos

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PRINCE’ AMELIO MASON WINDSOR, I,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 2:24-cv-00099-CL

v. ORDER

SGT. A. CAMPOS, S. RENN, B. IRVING, and N. SOBOTTA,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#40), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#40) is adopted. Defendants’ Motion for summary judgment (#29) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of March, 2025. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER