Windsor v. Amrien

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 2003
Docket02-7423
StatusUnpublished

This text of Windsor v. Amrien (Windsor v. Amrien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Windsor v. Amrien, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7423

TERRY MILTON WINDSOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONALD J. AMRIEN, Medical Doctor; KAREN CRIM, Sergeant, Accomack County Jail; GRETTA SAMPLE, Nurse, Accomack County Jail,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ROBERT CROCKETT, Sheriff, Accomack County Jail; MIKE DABRASKI, Correctional Officer, Accomack County Jail; DEPUTY GOGA, Accomack County Jail; ACCOMACK COUNTY JAIL, Medical/Officer,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-01-799)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 23, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Milton Windsor, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Hartnett, AYRES & HARTNETT, Accomac, Virginia; Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Terry Milton Windsor appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Windsor v.

Amrien, No. CA-01-799 (E.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2002). In addition, we

find that Windsor’s complaints regarding the timeliness of the

filing of Defendants’ pleadings are unfounded. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Windsor v. Amrien, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windsor-v-amrien-ca4-2003.