Windsor Park Tenants' Ass'n v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

389 N.E.2d 1110, 46 N.Y.2d 1058, 416 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1965
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 3, 1979·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal and for a stay dismissed upon the [1059]*1059grounds that (1) the order of the Appellate Division sought to be reviewed [see 59 AD2d 121] does not necessarily affect the final determination as required by CPLR 5602 (subd [a], par 1, cl [ii]) (Martin v Alabama 84 Truck Rental, 33 NY2d 685; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 79, p 344), and (2) movants are not aggrieved by said order of the Appellate Division (CPLR 5511; Matter of Ton-Da-Lay v Diamond, 36 NY2d 856; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 91, pp 393-394).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Windsor Park Tenants' Ass'n v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board, 389 N.E.2d 1110, 46 N.Y.2d 1058, 416 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1965 (N.Y. 1979).

389 N.E.2d 1110 (Windsor Park Tenants' Ass'n v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Alabama 84 Truck Rental, Inc.
304 N.E.2d 366 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)
Windsor Park Tenants' Ass'n v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
59 A.D.2d 121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)