Windsor Metal Fabrication, Ltd. v. York Hunter Construction, Inc.

273 A.D.2d 318, 710 N.Y.S.2d 538, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6521

This text of 273 A.D.2d 318 (Windsor Metal Fabrication, Ltd. v. York Hunter Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Windsor Metal Fabrication, Ltd. v. York Hunter Construction, Inc., 273 A.D.2d 318, 710 N.Y.S.2d 538, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Murphy, J.), dated August 19, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court dated August 10, 1999, confirming the arbitration award, is in favor of the petitioner and against York Hunter Construction, Inc., in the principal sum of $92,408.

Ordered that the notice of appeal from the order is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioner is awarded one bill of costs.

An arbitration award will not be vacated even if the arbitrator misconstrues or disregards the plain meaning of the parties’ contract or misapplies substantive law, unless the award is totally irrational or violative of a strong public policy (see, Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 NY2d 299, 308; Matter of Exercycle Corp. [Maratta], 9 NY2d 329, 336-337; Matter of Kaplan v Werlin, 215 AD2d 388, 390). Here, there is no claim that the arbitrator’s award violated public policy and the appellant failed to demonstrate that the award was irrational. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition to confirm the award. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Arbitration between Exercycle Corp. & Maratta
174 N.E.2d 463 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Norris v. Cooper
461 N.E.2d 1261 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Kaplan v. Werlin
215 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 A.D.2d 318, 710 N.Y.S.2d 538, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windsor-metal-fabrication-ltd-v-york-hunter-construction-inc-nyappdiv-2000.