Windsor Contracting Corp. v. Budny
236 A.2d 885, 51 N.J. 5, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 146
This text of 236 A.2d 885 (Windsor Contracting Corp. v. Budny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Windsor Contracting Corp. v. Budny, 236 A.2d 885, 51 N.J. 5, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 146 (N.J. 1967).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division, 93 N. J. Super. 235. Mr. Justice Proctor votes to reverse for the reasons given by Judge Goldmann in his dissenting opinion.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Wbintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Schettino and Haneman—5.
For reversal—Justice Pboctoe—1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Whitmore v. NJ Div. of Motor Vehicles
349 A.2d 560 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
236 A.2d 885, 51 N.J. 5, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windsor-contracting-corp-v-budny-nj-1967.