Windrush Inc v. Lee Vanpopering

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 2015·No. 150118·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

July 2, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

150118 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

WINDRUSH, INC., Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 150118 COA: 315958 Kent CC: 09-008274-CK

LEE VANPOPERING, SHAGBARK DEVELOPMENT, INC., and NORTHLAND MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to that court for reconsideration in light of BC Tile & Marble Co, Inc v Multi Building Co, Inc, 288 Mich App 576 (2010).

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 2, 2015

d0630

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Windrush Inc v. Lee Vanpopering, (Mich. 2015).

Windrush Inc v. Lee Vanpopering (Windrush Inc v. Lee Vanpopering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BC Tile & Marble Co. v. Multi Building Co.
794 N.W.2d 76 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2010)