Windrush Inc v. Lee Vanpopering
This text of Windrush Inc v. Lee Vanpopering (Windrush Inc v. Lee Vanpopering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 2, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly 150118 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano WINDRUSH, INC., Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 150118 COA: 315958 Kent CC: 09-008274-CK LEE VANPOPERING, SHAGBARK DEVELOPMENT, INC., and NORTHLAND MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to that court for reconsideration in light of BC Tile & Marble Co, Inc v Multi Building Co, Inc, 288 Mich App 576 (2010).
We do not retain jurisdiction.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 2, 2015 d0630 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Windrush Inc v. Lee Vanpopering, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windrush-inc-v-lee-vanpopering-mich-2015.