Windowmaster Corp. v. James A. Knowles, Inc.

193 So. 2d 46
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1966·No. No. 66-449·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is from an order of May 11, 1966 which denied the plaintiff’s (appellant’s) motion for rehearing. The motion for rehearing was directed to a previous order of April 1, 1966, which had transferred the cause from Dade County to Pinellas County, Florida, on the grounds of improper venue.

An interloctory appeal from an order denying a motion for rehearing does not bring up for appellate review the correctness of other interlocutory orders previously entered in the cause. Taborsky v. Mathews, Fla.App.1962, 137 So.2d 880; McNary v. Hudson, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 73. No error having been demonstrated, we affirm.

Notwithstanding this rule, we have examined the case on its merits and have determined that the order transferring the cause because of improper venue was correct.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Windowmaster Corp. v. James A. Knowles, Inc., 193 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

193 So. 2d 46 (Windowmaster Corp. v. James A. Knowles, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holzman v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
303 So. 2d 678 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)