Window Glass Mach. Co. v. New Bethlehem Window Glass Co.

269 F. 979, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2375
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Window Glass Mach. Co. v. New Bethlehem Window Glass Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 F. 822
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 17, 1921·No. No. 2590·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The general course of procedure pursued by the court below in this matter was heretofore considered by this court in an opinion reported at 264 Fed. 822. While the particular steps that have since been taken in the cases in the state court were not then before us, the fact is that such steps are but the logical and to be expected sequence of the situation that was then before us, and the possibility of such events was considered by this court when it disposed of the matter.

[980]*980In view of this situation, we find no error in the court below refusing to enjoin such further proceedings in the state court case. Its order is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Window Glass Mach. Co. v. New Bethlehem Window Glass Co., 269 F. 979, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2375 (3d Cir. 1921).

269 F. 979 (Window Glass Mach. Co. v. New Bethlehem Window Glass Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related