Window Glass Mach. Co. v. New Bethlehem Window Glass Co.
This text of 269 F. 979 (Window Glass Mach. Co. v. New Bethlehem Window Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The general course of procedure pursued by the court below in this matter was heretofore considered by this court in an opinion reported at 264 Fed. 822. While the particular steps that have since been taken in the cases in the state court were not then before us, the fact is that such steps are but the logical and to be expected sequence of the situation that was then before us, and the possibility of such events was considered by this court when it disposed of the matter.
[980]*980In view of this situation, we find no error in the court below refusing to enjoin such further proceedings in the state court case. Its order is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 F. 979, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/window-glass-mach-co-v-new-bethlehem-window-glass-co-ca3-1921.