Window Cleaning Unlimited v. Jack Eckerd Corp.

655 So. 2d 1248, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5722, 1995 WL 316348
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 26, 1995
DocketNos. 94-1323 & 94-1324
StatusPublished

This text of 655 So. 2d 1248 (Window Cleaning Unlimited v. Jack Eckerd Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Window Cleaning Unlimited v. Jack Eckerd Corp., 655 So. 2d 1248, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5722, 1995 WL 316348 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Benna M. and Lincoln C. Bledsoe, appeal a summary final judgment in favor of Jack Eckerd Corporation, in a slip and fall case that occurred near the entrance of an Eckerd’s drug store in Orlando. We agree with appellants that Jack Eckerd Corporation had a duty to patrons such as appellant, Benna M. Bledsoe, to maintain the ingress and egress to its store in a reasonably safe condition. See, e.g., Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. Petterson, 291 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). We further agree that, given the current state of this record, Jack Eckerd Corporation has failed to conclusively show that there is an absence of any genuine issue of fact concerning whether it was negligent in the maintenance of the area of ingress and egress to its store.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., and M. ORFINGER, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. Petterson
291 So. 2d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
655 So. 2d 1248, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5722, 1995 WL 316348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/window-cleaning-unlimited-v-jack-eckerd-corp-fladistctapp-1995.