Windom v. Dodge Logging
910 P.2d 1175, 139 Or. App. 130, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 107
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 7, 1996·No. WCB 93-05126; CA A85288·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Petitioner argues that the Workers’ Compensation Board erred in holding that he was ineligible for vocational assistance because his claim was in “own motion” status. The statute pertinent to his petition, ORS 656.278, has been amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332. Because the amended version of the statute is applicable, we reverse and remand for reconsideration in the light of the new law. Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995).
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Windom v. Dodge Logging, 910 P.2d 1175, 139 Or. App. 130, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 107 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
910 P.2d 1175 (Windom v. Dodge Logging) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SAIF Corp. v. Elizondo
914 P.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)