Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Windom v. Dodge Logging

Windom v. Dodge Logging

910 P.2d 1175, 139 Or. App. 130, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 107
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 7, 1996
DocketWCB 93-05126; CA A85288
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 910 P.2d 1175 (Windom v. Dodge Logging) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Windom v. Dodge Logging, 910 P.2d 1175, 139 Or. App. 130, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 107 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner argues that the Workers’ Compensation Board erred in holding that he was ineligible for vocational assistance because his claim was in “own motion” status. The statute pertinent to his petition, ORS 656.278, has been amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332. Because the amended version of the statute is applicable, we reverse and remand for reconsideration in the light of the new law. Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SAIF Corp. v. Elizondo
914 P.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
910 P.2d 1175, 139 Or. App. 130, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windom-v-dodge-logging-orctapp-1996.