Windmuller v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Windmuller v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

2 D.C. 146

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 1, 1935

DocketEquity No. 57931

StatusPublished

This text of 2 D.C. 146 (Windmuller v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Windmuller v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 2 D.C. 146 (D.C. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

BAILEY, J.

I think that the Reconstruction Finance Corporation was empowered by law to make the loans in question to a de facto corporation or to individuals conducting a banking business and to receive as security for the loan assets of the banker. The plaintiff does not offer to do equity by tendering the amount of money advanced and apart from any other question this failure to offer to do equity requires the dismissal of the bill. Her rights, if any, are not against the defendants to this suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

BAILEY, J.

I think that the Reconstruction Finance Corporation was empowered by law to make the loans in question to a de facto corporation or to individuals conducting a banking business and to receive as security for the loan assets of the banker. The plaintiff does not offer to do equity by tendering the amount of money advanced and apart from any other question this failure to offer to do equity requires the dismissal of the bill. Her rights, if any, are not against the defendants to this suit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 D.C. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windmuller-v-reconstruction-finance-corp-dc-1935.