Windley v. Westchester County

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK a penne nner □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ ibseoa! IAN WINDLEY, Plaintiff, -against- 19 CIVIL 4858 (PMH) JUDGMENT WESTCHESTER COUNTY, et al., Defendants. een nee ne eee XK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated January 27, 2021, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. While "[d]istrict courts should frequently provide leave to amend before dismissing a pro se complaint... leave to amend is not necessary when it would be futile.” Reed v. Friedman Met. Corp., 541 F. Appx 40, 41 (2d Cir. 2013) (citing Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000)). Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as any amendment would be futile; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York January 28, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: 1N1AGo Deputy Cler