Windley v. . Lupton

193 S.E. 213, 212 N.C. 167, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 259
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 13, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 S.E. 213 (Windley v. . Lupton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Windley v. . Lupton, 193 S.E. 213, 212 N.C. 167, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 259 (N.C. 1937).

Opinion

This action was begun in the Superior Court of Beaufort County on 7 November, 1935.

On the facts alleged in the complaint, the plaintiff Clifton Windley prays judgment that he recover of the defendants D. W. Lupton, deputy sheriff of Beaufort County, and American Surety Company of New York, surety on the official bonds of the sheriffs of said county, by whom *Page 168 the said D. W. Lupton was appointed deputy sheriff, the sum of $224.00, and interest on the sum of $260.00 from 26 January, 1932, until 1 December, 1934, at the rate of 12 per cent, and interest on the sum of $224.00 from 1 December, 1934, until paid, at the rate of 12 per cent, and the costs of the action.

After the complaint was filed, on motion of the defendants D. W. Lupton and American Surety Company of New York, Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, and Thad Eure, Escheat Officer, were made parties defendant to the action on 13 December, 1935.

In their answer the defendants D. W. Lupton and American Surety Company of New York admitted the material allegations of the complaint, and on the facts alleged in their cross action against their codefendants, Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, and Thad Eure, Escheat Officer, prayed judgment that they recover of their said codefendants such sum or sums as the plaintiff should recover of them, or of either of them, in this action.

After he had filed an answer to the cross action alleged against him in the answer of his codefendants D. W. Lupton and American Surety Company of New York, the defendant Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, moved that the action of the plaintiff and the cross action of his codefendants be dismissed as to him. The motion was allowed, and both the action of the plaintiffs and the cross action of the defendants D. W. Lupton and American Surety Company of New York was dismissed as to the defendant Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks.

After he had filed an answer to the cross action alleged against him in the answer of his codefendants. D. W. Lupton and American Surety Company of New York, the defendant Thad Eure, Escheat Officer, moved that the action of the plaintiff and the cross action of his codefendant be dismissed as to him. The motion was denied and the defendant Thad Eure, Escheat Officer, duly excepted.

When the action was called for trial, a trial by jury of the issues raised by the pleadings was waived by the parties. It was agreed by them that the court should hear the evidence and find the facts. In accordance with this agreement, the court heard the evidence and found the facts to be substantially as follows:

1. On or about 1 April, 1931, the defendant D. W. Lupton, a deputy sheriff of Beaufort County, under a criminal warrant in his hands, arrested one Willie Daw, and held him in custody under said criminal warrant pending the trial of the action in which the warrant was issued.

2. While the said Willie Daw was in the custody of said defendant D. W. Lupton, the plaintiff Clifton Windley drew his check on the Bank of Washington for the sum of $400.00. The said check was payable to the order of the said D. W. Lupton and was accepted by him in *Page 169 lieu of bond for the appearance of Willie Daw at the trial of the criminal action in which the warrant had been issued. Upon his acceptance of said check, the defendant D. W. Lupton released the said Willie Daw from custody.

3. The defendant D. W. Lupton endorsed the check delivered to him by the plaintiff and deposited it with the Farmers Bank of Belhaven, on 29 April, 1931, for collection. The check was duly forwarded by the Farmers Bank of Belhaven to the Bank of Washington, and was paid by the Bank of Washington on 4 May, 1931. The amount of said check was charged by the Bank of Washington to the account of the plaintiff Clifton Windley, and was duly remitted to the Farmers Bank of Belhaven, and by said Farmers Bank credited to the account of the defendant D. W. Lupton. No notice was given by said Farmers Bank to the said D. W. Lupton that the check had been paid by the Bank of Washington, or that its amount had been credited to his account with the Farmers Bank of Belhaven.

4. On or about 20 May, 1931, the Farmers Bank of Belhaven closed because of its insolvency, and Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, took possession of said Farmers Bank for the purpose of liquidating its assets, as required by statute, and at once entered upon such liquidation.

5. After the said Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, had taken possession of the Farmers Bank of Belhaven, the defendant D. W. Lupton was informed that plaintiff's check for $400.00, payable to his order, had been paid by the Bank of Washington, and that the amount of said check had been credited to his account. Immediately upon learning that the amount of said check had been credited to his account by the Farmers Bank of Belhaven, prior to its insolvency, the defendant D. W. Lupton informed the liquidating agent of Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, of all the facts with reference to his deposit of said check with the said Farmers Bank of Belhaven. He was advised by said liquidating agent to file a claim for the amount due him by the said Farmers Bank, as a depositor, including the sum of $400.00, the proceeds of the check which he had deposited with said bank for collection. In accordance with said advice, and pursuant to the instructions of said liquidating agent, the defendant D. W. Lupton, on 13 June, 1931, filed with Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, his claim against the Farmers Bank of Belhaven, for the sum of $907.83. This claim was duly allowed by the said Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, as a common claim against the Farmers Bank of Belhaven, and a certificate to that effect was duly issued to the defendant D. W. Lupton by the liquidating agent of the said Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks.

6. At January Term, 1932, of the Superior Court of the Beaufort County, an order was entered in the action entitled "State v. Willie Daw," then *Page 170 pending in said court, that the defendant D. W. Lupton return to the plaintiff Clifton Windley the sum of $400.00, paid to him by the said Windley in lieu of an appearance bond for the said Willie Daw.

7. On or before 1 December, 1934, Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, paid to the defendant D. W. Lupton, as dividends on his claim against the Farmers Bank of Belhaven, the sums of $140.00, and $36.00, which were promptly paid by the defendant D. W. Lupton to the plaintiff Clifton Windley, on account of the amount deposited with him by the plaintiff in lieu of an appearance bond for Willie Daw.

8. The defendant American Surety Company of New York was the surety on the official bond of the sheriff of Beaufort County, at the date of the receipt by the defendant D. W. Lupton from the plaintiff of the sum of $400.00, and also at the date of the order of the judge of the Superior Court of Beaufort County that said defendant return said sum to the plaintiff. At both dates, the defendant D. W. Lupton was a duly appointed deputy sheriff of Beaufort County.

9. The liquidation of the Farmers Bank of Belhaven was completed by Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, prior to 27 May, 1935, and the sum of $1,170.40, then in his hands as the aggregate amount of dividends due to persons who had failed to file their claims, was paid by him into the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Beaufort County, as required by statute.

On 27 May, 1935, the clerk of the Superior Court of Beaufort County delivered to the defendant Thad Eure, as agent of the University of North Carolina, his check on the Bank of Washington for the sum of $1,170.40. This check was payable to the University of North Carolina.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Underwood v. Watson
27 S.E.2d 144 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.E. 213, 212 N.C. 167, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windley-v-lupton-nc-1937.