Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

161 A. 410, 306 Pa. 194, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 420

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 7, 1932

DocketAppeal, 369

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 161 A. 410 (Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 161 A. 410, 306 Pa. 194, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 420 (Pa. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that this is not a ease “clear and free from doubt,” this being so, the order discharging the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is affirmed: Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy et al. (No. 2), 302 Pa. 329, 331; Sharples v. Northampton Trans. Co., 303 Pa. 211, 212; Chelten Avenue Building Corp. v. Mayer, 306 Pa. 225; Penna. Co. for Insurances, etc., v. Bergson, 307 Pa. 44.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that this is not a ease “clear and free from doubt,” this being so, the order discharging the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is affirmed: Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy et al. (No. 2), 302 Pa. 329, 331; Sharples v. Northampton Trans. Co., 303 Pa. 211, 212; Chelten Avenue Building Corp. v. Mayer, 306 Pa. 225; Penna. Co. for Insurances, etc., v. Bergson, 307 Pa. 44.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 A. 410, 306 Pa. 194, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windisch-v-first-camden-nat-bank-trust-co-pa-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack