Winder Bros. v. Sterling

Texas Commission of Appeals

Winder Bros. v. Sterling

14 S.W.2d 802

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 1929

DocketMotion No. 8405; No. 1127-5064

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 14 S.W.2d 802 (Winder Bros. v. Sterling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winder Bros. v. Sterling, 14 S.W.2d 802 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

NICKELS, J.

Relators in their motion for rehearing complain that we did not pass “upon applicant’s contention that the statute * * * is violative of the Constitution of the United States, as amended by the Fifteenth Amendment thereto.” We assume that counsel intended to refer to the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Be that as it may, no reference to the Federal Constitution is made in the petition in mandamus.

But if the contention were made, the re-suits stated in our original opinion for denying the claim of lack of due process required in the state Constitution would cause us to make a like holding in respect to due process under the Federal Constitution.

The other matters presented in the motion for rehearing were considered by us originally, and upon reconsideration We adhere to the views then expressed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NICKELS, J.

Relators in their motion for rehearing complain that we did not pass “upon applicant’s contention that the statute * * * is violative of the Constitution of the United States, as amended by the Fifteenth Amendment thereto.” We assume that counsel intended to refer to the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Be that as it may, no reference to the Federal Constitution is made in the petition in mandamus.

But if the contention were made, the re-suits stated in our original opinion for denying the claim of lack of due process required in the state Constitution would cause us to make a like holding in respect to due process under the Federal Constitution.

The other matters presented in the motion for rehearing were considered by us originally, and upon reconsideration We adhere to the views then expressed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 S.W.2d 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winder-bros-v-sterling-texcommnapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack