Windeknecht v. Stubblefield

98 S.W.3d 884, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 281, 2003 WL 716835
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 2003·No. No. ED 82382·Published

Opinion

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Chief Judge.

Larry Windeknecht appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus.

We are obligated to determine whether we have jurisdiction and, if we lack jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Fischer v. City of Washington, 55 S.W.3d 372, 377 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An appeal does not lie from a decision in a habeas corpus proceeding. Bebee v. State, 619 S.W.2d 363 (Mo.App. S.D.1981). Where a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied, petitioner’s remedy is by way of a successive application for writ of habeas corpus. State ex rel. Bennett v. Gagne, 623 S.W.2d 87, 89 (Mo.App. W.D.1981).

The appeal is dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment.

LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Windeknecht v. Stubblefield, 98 S.W.3d 884, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 281, 2003 WL 716835 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

98 S.W.3d 884 (Windeknecht v. Stubblefield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bebee v. State
619 S.W.2d 363 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)
Fischer v. City of Washington
55 S.W.3d 372 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)
State ex rel. Bennett v. Gagne
623 S.W.2d 87 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)