Winchip v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Winchip v. State

578 So. 2d 902, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4467, 1991 WL 71561

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 1991

DocketNo. 91-0768

StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 902 (Winchip v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winchip v. State, 578 So. 2d 902, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4467, 1991 WL 71561 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying this post-conviction relief motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 does not state that the movant may appeal within thirty days of rendition of the order. Accordingly, we grant belated appeal and affirm on the ground that there was not an adequate jurat, without prejudice to appellant’s filing a rule 3.850 motion, fully conforming to the rule requirements.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying this post-conviction relief motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 does not state that the movant may appeal within thirty days of rendition of the order. Accordingly, we grant belated appeal and affirm on the ground that there was not an adequate jurat, without prejudice to appellant’s filing a rule 3.850 motion, fully conforming to the rule requirements.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 902, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4467, 1991 WL 71561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winchip-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.