Winchester v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Winchester v. State

36 So. 3d 918, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8196, 2010 WL 2292226

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 9, 2010

Docket4D09-3259

StatusPublished

This text of 36 So. 3d 918 (Winchester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winchester v. State, 36 So. 3d 918, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8196, 2010 WL 2292226 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Winchester appeals from an order treating his letter to the presiding judge as a motion for rehearing as to the denial of his rule 3.170(£) motion to vacate plea, and denying it. The undated letter was filed nearly two months after the date of entry of the order denying the motion to withdraw plea, on April 27, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed 1 three months after that date.

In his initial brief, Winchester asks this court to consider the letter to be a rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We decline to do so, and instead dismiss the appeal as untimely. See Bridges v. State, 863 So.2d 366 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction because notice of appeal was not timely; *919 defendant’s pro se letter requesting reconsideration of order denying motion to withdraw plea was unauthorized).

Dismissed.

WARNER, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

1

. The notice of appeal bears a certificate of service dated July 28, 2009. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.420(a)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI