Winchester v. Shaw
This text of 69 Me. 536 (Winchester v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a writ of error to reverse the judgment of a trial justice. Oné of the errors assigned, as matter of law, is that judgment was rendered for costs illegally taxed, and for a larger sum than the amount of all the items taxed and allowed by the justice.
By an inspection of the items of costs taxed and allowed by the justice, and referred to in the judgment and made a part thereof, the amount is found to be $3.92. Judgment was ren[537]*537dcred for the debt claimed and for $4.96 costs of suit. This is manifest error apparent upon the record. Valentine v. Norton, 30 Maine, 194. McArthur v. Storrett, 43 Maine, 345.
As the judgment must be reversed for this error, it is unnecessary to consider the other errors assigned.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 Me. 536, 1879 Me. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winchester-v-shaw-me-1879.