Winchester v. Porretto

432 S.W.2d 170, 1968 Tex. App. LEXIS 3060
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 12, 1968
Docket15293
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 432 S.W.2d 170 (Winchester v. Porretto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winchester v. Porretto, 432 S.W.2d 170, 1968 Tex. App. LEXIS 3060 (Tex. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PEDEN, Justice.

Appellant filed this cause seeking title to and possession of certain lots outside of the seawall on Galveston beach, basing his claim on the ten year statute of limitations. He appeals from a summary judgment in favor of appellees.

The narrow question presented on appeal is whether appellant’s affidavit, deposition and petition raise a fact issue as to whether his use and possession of the property were such as to constitute adverse possession, an “actual and visible appropriation of the land, commenced and continued under a claim of right inconsistent with and hostile to the claim of another” which is a necessary element of the ten year limitation statute, Article 5510, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, the definition of such term being set out in Article 5515, V.C.S.

In reviewing the deposition and affidavit evidence, all of which comes from the appellant, we will consider that it is true, but will disregard his conclusions of law. In his second amended petition appellant asserts a claim for 33 lots or parts of lots on the beach. His deposition shows that such lots are unmarked and are divided by unmarked public streets, alleys and by other lots into ten tracts. Mr. Winchester testified by deposition that on or about May 1, 1941, he began using the property by placing beach chairs, umbrellas and floats on it, renting them to the public, and selling cold drinks. At various times and places posts have been erected by the County and by appellant at six or seven foot intervals to keep automobiles out of the area, but the general public has always been encouraged to come onto the area; the posts have sometimes been connected by rails, but openings have always been left so that ready access was always available to people on foot.

High tides and storms repeatedly washed away or covered up the posts. In his deposition it is noted:

“Q Now, you have described for us the way in which posts, fences or whatever you call them, would be washed out by high tide and storms. Now, over the years if a fence or row of posts was washed out by a storm or by high water, it would usually stay down or stay washed out until the next spring, is that right ?
“A Well, I don’t recall the length of time, how long they would stay down or the particular years they were washed out. The fence is washed out right now, it was washed out after — I was away at the time, but I believe it was in October. It’s still down, parts of it.”

Appellant points out that the lots are not suitable for growing crops or for raising or grazing cattle. Their best use is as a bathing beach, and he has operated his *172 concession stands in that area for more than ten seasons beginning in the summer of 1941. He states that he has kept the area clean, has not permitted ball playing, has excluded competitors and has ejected those who became unruly or intoxicated. In his affidavit he related that these acts “were calculated to attract and bring as many people to the property as possible, because I was in the business to cater to the public. I also was instrumental in providing safety measures for the protection of swimmers and bathers, in that a lifeguard was installed on a high platform to guard this area. I also provided and had available a first aid kit, and provided solutions for bathers who had been effected by sea nettle, jelly fish and other stinging sea life. I excluded automobiles, obnoxious people, and all other competitors. A number of people came to me to request permission to set up stands and to rent equipment. These, I refused. At all other times, I wanted, and made every effort, to bring as many people to the area as possible. During the summer months I placed over 350 chairs, 100 umbrellas, and numerous portable canvas cabanas, all over the property, and rented such articles, together with inflated floats, to the general public, whom I was attracting to my area. My employees and I cleaned up the area daily and raked it. We also repaired and built equipment for rental. During the off-season, my employees and I kept the area clean and free of logs and raked it with the mechanical rake regularly, though not as often as in the tourist season in the warmer days. I had built a large, heavy stairway from the top of the seawall to the sands below, to provide a safe and convenient access to the property, and many people and children constantly used it.”

In his deposition Mr. Winchester testified :

“Q And at all times, as long as you can remember, people can come and go on foot throughout this entire area, isn’t that correct?
“A Yes, that’s correct.
“Q And in fact, at all times, they have gone all over that beachfront, in the 10th-Street-to-Stewart-Beach line every summer, every winter, every spring and every fall, isn’t that right?
“A We have encouraged them to come down there.
“Q And people do enjoy using that beach, isn’t that right ?
“A Yes.
“Q And they can walk between the posts anywhere they want to go, isn’t that right?
“A Yes.
“Q Galvestonians, Texans from the mainland and people from other states, isn’t that right ?
“A Yes.”

His concession stands and equipment shacks (for overnight storage of umbrellas, beach chairs and floats and for their repair were sometimes built on skids so they could be moved; others were built on piling. Mr. Winchester ■ testified that one such building lasted three of four years, but the others were washed away or broken up by storms in a considerably shorter time. He related:

“Q All right, then when did you build the next one?
“A Well, every year if I was washed out, I mean, I’d have one back. It may not be in the exact location, but there was always a concession stand and equipment stands that were used for the storage of equipment and also maybe one or two small concession stands which were placed on the beach. And their location varied, I mean, as to when I had to rebuild them.”

With further reference to the seasonal nature of his use of the area, Mr. Winchester testified by deposition :

“Q -What do you mean by the expression ‘The summer season’ ?
*173 “A The summer season would be classified as the beginning of the bathing season in the City of Galveston, when people begin to rent the floats and chairs and umbrellas.
“Q And normally that bathing season or summer season, as you have called it, extends through what month of the year?
“A I would say up to October or when the weather begins to get a little cooler.
“Q It normally commences somewhere in the neighborhood of the 1st of May of each year?
“A Yes.
“Q And runs until when ?
“A Well, you can’t actually set a date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

David P. Hissey v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010
James A. Hopkins and Jean C. Hopkins v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009
Masonic Building Ass'n of Houston v. McWhorter
177 S.W.3d 465 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Reba Dennis v. Sally Stone
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
Terrill v. Tuckness
985 S.W.2d 97 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Templeton v. Dreiss
961 S.W.2d 645 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Adamson v. Doornbos
587 S.W.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Ramirez v. Wood
577 S.W.2d 278 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
City of Houston v. Church
554 S.W.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Vaughan v. Anderson
495 S.W.2d 327 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Bramlett v. Harris and Eliza Kempner Fund
462 S.W.2d 104 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
432 S.W.2d 170, 1968 Tex. App. LEXIS 3060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winchester-v-porretto-texapp-1968.